Prime Minister Theresa May was compelled to leave. The Britain’s parliament is stagnated. Both the Conservative and Labor parties are highly divided and deeply in dissonance with each other.Nobody has recognized a definite path to an agreement that will prevent a result -an expensive and problematic no-deal Brexit. It is a decision which everybody claims they want to prevent. However, Britain has not exited the European Union and still people are speculating what will be the implications of it. This article will give you a list of things which have halted Brexit.
Following is the detailed list of things that halted Brexit
1. Lack of Plan by UK
George Bridges was the latest Brexit minister made from base in 2016 when Theresa May was the prime minister. At least, Bridges had an office to work in. The political consultants of Secretary of State David Davis had to share a cupboard, while the senior official of the unit had to alter his desk three times in one day. It had been a chaos. Bridges and the top officials of EU in Brussels were waiting for Britain to propose a plan to exit.
The reality is that when the UK decided to quit, there was no concrete plan for Brexit. When David Cameron announced and conducted the EU referendum, he had no Plan B. One senior official claims he forbade the civil servants to prepare the plan as he was afraid it might leak.Without a proper strategy or planfor Brexit, Theresa May went to the cabinet. Indeed, she hardly cited Brexit in her speech at Downing Street.
2. Lack of Plan by EU
President of France, François Hollande states he warned his associate EU representatives immediately after the referendum that the Britain would have to bear a high cost due to Brexit.The employees of Jean-Claude Juncker’s office were in tears, the chairman of the European Commission, when he and his representatives learned that the people of UK had chosen to quit EU.
There was no plan of action for the EU. And this had a negative effect on the EU. Due to this, French National Front chief Marine Le Pen had started campaigning for “Frexit.”
Everyone viewed EU of lacking potential to preserve the unity of the member countries. EU did not have a proper plan to handle Brexit and its consequences on EU. There was always going to be a conflict between defending the economic system and getting back control of measures such as immigration. It was a conflict that has never been fully addressed by EU.
3. No one backed May’s decision
Theresa May expected to enhance her stance and simply accomplish what individuals voted for in the referendum, but the outcome effectively rendered that work even more problematic.By the way, it was not only the closest consultants and ministers of May who assisted in persuading her to conduct an election for Brexit.Jean-Claude Juncker’s allies, confess that while he’ll never have encouraged her to conduct an election, he advised her that gaining her own mandate would assist her.Juncker suggested that a small majority in a House of Commons was not much passionate about Brexit than the British public.
Theresa May ultimately required MPs to enact a Brexit agreement with the EU. However, she lacked such a support. Ultimately, the danger of no-deal Brexit is looming over the UK.
4. The threat of no-deal
The Prime Minister considered no deal to be a better than having a bad deal. The formal predictions have been evident. A no-deal Brexit would result in 10 percent tariffs on vehicle imports and 40 percent tariffs on lamb sales.One of the top leaders who handled Brexit informed ministers that demanding no deal agreement were quite threatening for the economy of the UK. The dissonance among the two major parties & May’s support for the no- deal Brexit has led to the delay. This is one of the major thing that halted Brexit.
5. Dissonance among MPs
The two major political parties have tried to outflank each other on Brexit. The opposing party is using Brexit as a manner to try to initiate a national general election.Simon Coveney is condescending about the inability of the UK Parliament and the democratic system to reach an agreement on Brexit. It’s a strong contrast to the cohesion that was shown in Dublin.He accuses the opposing Labor Party for this. EU rulers such as Frans Timmermans think that Political leaders do not comprehend the idealism and background underlying the European economy. He claims “mainland Europeans” don’t see the EU in the very same manner as the United Kingdom.
Brexit will have a negative impact on both the European Union and the UK. But delaying or halting Brexit will not reduce the negative impacts. And having a no-deal Brexit will be even more catastrophic for the economies in the Europe. I hope this article was helpful in elaborating things that halted Brexit.